Legalizing Gay Marriage Essay examples
Most societies view homosexuality as something that is horribly wrong. People view sexual relations between like genders as disgusting. For thousands of years homosexuality has existed on this Earth, but the question is, what makes it so wrong? During my research I have yet to find a legitimate reason as to why homosexuality is so wrong. With homosexual relationships, comes the question about homosexual marriage. Should gay marriage become legal in all fifty United States, or should it stay illegal in some states and remain legal in others? Most of society's issues and controversies come forth when subjects like religion, the home life, and values are discussed. The real question is who is society to judge someone, who doesn't care about...show more content...
This raises my question, why can't they marry one another, and are we still in discriminatory times. Politically speaking, legalizing gay marriage should have never been an issue. Do we have a contradicting society? How is that we are all supposed to be equal and have equal opportunities without race, gender, religion, etc restricting us, and still view gays and lesbians as inferior to the 'normal' heterosexual? Whoever said being heterosexual was considered 'normal'? It is not okay for gays to pay taxes that help Social Security, Medicare, and other benefits, when they can't get what they for from our government. This actually takes away from human right. Everyone should have the right to marry the person that they love and cherish no matter their sexual orientation. Considering the fact that we live in a Democracy, this is very unfair. People argue that most Americans look at marriage as a religious ceremony. Religious individuals and groups feel that they will become at risk of having to violate their beliefs by being forced to marry same–sex couples (Robinson). I am a Christian and I view religion as a belief. If someone has to marry a gay couple, they are strictly doing their job, so therefore the individual technically is not violating their religion. The individuals that are getting married are violating their religion, but they can take that up with their higher power, that is, if
One of the most controversial issues around today is gay marriages. Many believe that the media is primly responsible for the idea of same–sex marriages, but when it all comes down to it there are really only two sides; those who support gay marriages, and those who oppose them. Two authors write their opinions on their opposite views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports same–sex marriages and believes marriage to be a universal right, not just restricted to heterosexuals. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is a sacred traditional family value that should be set aside for heterosexual couples. (2002)Throughout this essay, I will summarize both authors' ideas and evaluate them through their evidence and...show more content...
Bennett's article is a response to Sullivan's and states that gay marriages should not be allowed. Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is done in the sight of God and thus should be treated with high regards and also believes gay marriages to be corrupting today's society. He believes that, "...marriage is not an arbitrary construct which can be redefined simply by those who and human realities. It is an honorable estate, instituted of God and built on moral, religious, sexual and human realities."(2002:30) He goes on to explain how America's most important institutions such as neighborhoods and schools are fine just the way they are without gay marriages. (2002:30)
Though Sullivan and Bennett both make strong points for their cases against each other, they have many similar aspects to their articles. Both articles make similar evidentiary assertions by adding religion in to their discussions. Sullivan fights that in America there is a separation between church and state and therefore, church should not be added in to a discussion about same–sex marriages. (Sullivan 2002:26) Bennett (2002) makes different comments about this issue. Bennett (2002) believes that gay marriages are an insult to religion and thus should not be allowed in to America's proper institutions like church. (Bennett 2002:30)
Sullivan (2002) and Bennett (2002) both use religious assertions to explain their views on same–sex marriages. Sullivan (2002) says that
Bill Melanigan And Robert Daniel
22 December 2014
For five years Bill Flanigan and Robert Daniel lived like a married couple. By going to family reunions together, living together, and deeply loving each other. However, because of their law in their home state California, they were unable to legally wed. Despite this obstacle, they did everything they could to achieve the same legal status as heterosexual couples. They applied for domestic partnerships, they gave each other power of attorney, and they pulled their money. They considered themselves married. One day to a trip to Washington D.C, Robert had a health emergency. He was rushed to the hospital and intensive care unit. After following the ambulance all the way...show more content...
Gay and lesbian loving each other, in a committed relationship, does not threaten stability of heterosexual marriage. While Bill and Roberts story illuminates some of the problems gay couples face, it's really just the tip of the iceberg. In 2004 the U.S general accounting office released a report saying that there are well over 1,000 individual rights and benefits which homosexual couples are denied. Rights that heterosexual couples receive including tax breaks, social security benefits, and hospital visitation rights, and this is only counting for federal benefits and doesn't factor in the countless local and state laws, which regulate everything from medical benefits to adoption
Essay on Gay marriage
Critical Review – Gay Marriage "Unnatural"
Sheldon L, 1996, Gay Marriage "Unnatural", USA Today, USA.
Homosexual marriage is one of the old but controversial issues around the world. Compared to the past, it seems to become a more open debate among people. At the same time, people seem to be more swayable than before, but towards the gay marriage, different voices have still been hovering in the air. Gay people and their supporters have been striving for their rights to get married legally, while others who against gay marriage have never stopped deterring it.
Strongly against gay marriage is the central theme of Louis P. Sheldon's article Gay Marriage "Unnatural". According to the author's views, gay marriage is 'unnatural', and...show more content...
The numbers he presented seem attractive and persuasive, but it is worth noting that no source has been provided for them, so readers do not know how trustworthy they are. In my view, it would be more convincing for example to try referencing the data in his claims like the quoted above as well as the gay people's average income is twice higher than that of non–gay people in America, and his figures will not be questioned. The author of this article can therefore be criticised here for a lack of citation of sources to back up his views. Another questionable aspect of this article is its hidden premises. Although the author does not openly state that the marriage should be generational, otherwise they should get divorce, this could be understood from the authors's statement that gay marriage is "not generational". While marriage is not only about generating offspring but also means love. It is an insulting claim for the couples who in love but unfortunately could not have children might because fertility problems, health issues, over age, their chosen life style of Dink family, so do they have to separate with each other just because of that? Is it really the essence of marriage? I do not think so. In my view, whether to have kids or not in couples' marriage lives, it is a matter that couples, including gay couples need to consider and judge not by other irrelevant people, and it should not be an excuse to despoil
Essay about Gay Marriage
Same sex marriage is a topic today that brings strong moral objections from both sides. Should same sex marriage be allowed? I intend to analyze three different aspects relevant to this very controversial subject matter: Marriage as it exists as a religious institution, marriage as a contractual agreement, and finally, why I believe "marriage" should be allowed for everyone, straight, gay or otherwise. I strongly believe that to disallow same sex marriage simply as a registered, contractual partnership denies citizens American civil liberties, and should not be allowed.
Marriage, in my opinion, is a sacred rite deeply rooted in Christian faith that recognizes a family unit in its greatest and simplest form; the union of one man and...show more content...
Marriage has evolved over the years from a great Christian formula to simply a contractual, government recognized, partnership between two adults of sound mind. The roles of men and woman have also evolved. Woman are strong, intelligent, and under protection of law, equal to men in status and possibility for stature. With these universal rights, men and women alike are able to be, and have anything they want. Marriage as a contractual agreement allows that two consensual adults establish a defined hierarchy for decisions regarding property of their spouse, and responsibility for them in the event of their absence. Contemporary law allows that with this contractual agreement, certain rights are granted to each, in matters surrounding their partnership. This becomes controversial when the formula is changed. Why is it that one man, and one woman, still be a requirement? It seems that this union in terms of rights and responsibilities is independent of the factors defined by Christian faith and convention. Just as a very dark point in our history recognized that civil liberties were being denied to interracial couples in the last century, government stepped in and allowed interracial couples the freedoms every man woman and child is promised.
It is abundantly clear that each side believes that they are right in their views of weather a state should recognize gay marriage. Gay
Argumentative Essay On Gay Marriage
Gay marriage is an up and rising controversial issue, until seven years ago it wasn't common to come around others of the same sex married. In a span of seven years numbers raised from ⅓ to over ½ of the homosexual community that are now married to another partner. This topic caught my attention because several of my family members including the newest member my older sister, are now considered a part of the homosexual community, and it seems as time goes on this population continues to grow. For the past thousand years, marriage has been recognized as the social union between man and woman. Same–sex marriage is the legal union between two people of the same gender. Throughout history, same sex unions have taken place around the world, but laws recognizing such marriages did not start occurring until more modern times. In most cultures across the world, homosexuality was viewed as wrong, and marriages between same–sex couples were forbidden. The issue of gay marriage has been a raging battle since the late twentieth century. The individual States are left to determine the laws that govern this situation today. Gays and other liberals feel that they have a right to join together in harmony, while the conservative groups in the United States fight this situation persistently. Gay marriage can be a touchy subject for some and the way people were brought up could ultimately affect their views and opinions. With an increased tolerance for homosexuality in today's society, the
Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriage
Ellen DeGeneres, who is a famous TV host, once said, "Do we have to know who's gay and who's straight? Can't we just love everybody..." marriage is not about if your straight or gay it really about who you fall in love with and how that person is going to help you expand your life. As the year's pass, America became divided between being for or against gay marriage. The fact that in 1986 was when the court first considered the matter in gay marriage with the case of Bowers V Hardwick, a challenge to Georgia law authorizing criminal penalties for a person guilty of Sodom which prove that gay right law was questioned all the way back in the 19centuries. however, they are two supreme court decisions involving gay marriage, one decade apart, have left a lot of people wondering just where the law now stands with respect to the right to engage in homosexual conduct. However, we as the people, need to come together and help them give that right back to homosexual couples so they could be able to marry and live freely with their spouse. In addition, gay marriage should be legal in every state because denying some people the option to marry is discrimination and create second–class citizens; however, marriage is human rights and same–sex couples can make a better couple.
Denying someone the ability to marry whom they love is discrimination and creates the second class of citizen. The law should not have the right to pick and choose who they're
Critical essay on gay marriage
To begin, I must admit that I approached David Blankenhorn's book The Future of Marriage with some trepidation, as I know that he is against extending marriage to same–sex couples. After reading the book, however, I have to give him credit for approaching the issue with more respect than most who believe in preserving "family values." He doesn't fall into the easy and usual trap of moralizing about homosexuality being "wrong," "perverted," or "unnatural." In fact, he goes as far as saying "homosexual behavior is an important and normal (expected) occurrence in human societies" (Blankenhorn 115) and "[w]e as a society can and should accept the dignity of homosexual love and the equal worth of gay and lesbian persons" (179). Such...show more content...
And children born into married households are greatly advantaged. As such, "Marriage is society's most pro–child institution" (5). In the larger cultural, political, and legal debates over homosexuality, one significant smaller debate has been over homosexual parents: do children who are raised by homosexual parents or caregivers suffer disadvantages in comparison to children raised in other family structures––particularly children raised by a married mother and father? This question is essential to political and ethical debates over adoption, foster care, and artificial reproductive technology, and it is highly relevant to the raging debate over same–sex "marriage." The argument that "children need a mom and a dad" is central to the defense of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The research on how child fare in a two–parent household cemented by marriage is now voluminous. No other type of relationship is as good for children as heterosexual marriage. Family structure, in other words, matters overwhelmingly for children.
In a historic study of children raised by homosexual parents, sociologist Mark Regnerus of the University of Texas at Austin has overturned the conventional academic wisdom that such children suffer no disadvantages when compared to children raised by their married mother and father. Just published in the journal Social Science Research, a careful, rigorous, and methodologically study
Essay about Gay Marriage Rights
Gay marriage rights have been denied from homosexuals for years. It has been proven that it is okay and can function properly in todays society by mainly states in New England, and a few others. This situation greatly resembles interracial marriage back in the mid 60's, and now as a society we all look back and see how wrong it was for us to deny it. This fight gets bigger and stronger and continues to dominate the news. This has been one of the top fought over topics for the past half century and it will probably still be fought over for numerous more centuries no matter the outcome.
Taking away another human's right is just outrageous. In our society today, everyone deserves to have the equal amount of opportunity to be equal. The...show more content...
Married men earn more money than single men do with similar education and job history. Children raised by loving parents are less likely to be poor or to experience persistent economic insecurity. They are more likely to stay in school, have fewer behavioral and attendance problems, and earn four year college degrees. They are less vulnerable to serious emotional illness, depression and suicide. Children raised by two loving parents are also more likely to have positive attitudes towards marriage and greater success in forming lasting marriages. I know most people are thinking, "Well it says two loving parents, so that could just be heterosexual parents." Yes, it could, but if we allow homosexuals to take on the responsibility of doing it too, we can increase the number of happy and successful kids and we can lower all the kids without parents living unhappily in adoption facilities. I think supporters and non supporters of gay marriage can agree on one thing, kids need to be happy and have a loving home who helps them succeed and become responsible adults. Some studies have proven that children raised by lesbian couples are smarter and do better in school and the ones by gay male couples do the same as children of heterosexual parents. When you get down to the point, they are in just as healthy of an environment as any other children. It is very big for children to start off their life and their parents
Gay Marriage And The Constitution Essay
Gay Marriage and the Constitution
Axia College of University of Phoenix
Gay Marriage and the Constitution Is it okay to not believe in gay marriage, yet at the same time support the constitutional rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness for homosexual couples? Even though most churches' beliefs conflict with marrying same–sex partners, government should not deny a person's right to their happiness; because any person, no matter race, color, sex, religion or sexual orientation, should be allowed to exercise their constitutional rights as Americans to pursue their happiness; and married gay couples should be able to have a spectrum of rights and benefits if their gay partnership is legalized.
Equal...show more content...
How long must gays fight for equal rights that they were given at birth as a legal citizen of America? If gay marriage is legalized, this would mean a restructuring for employers.
Benefits and Rights
If gay marriage is legalized, employers would therefore be affected. Affected in the way that benefits available to married heterosexuals will then be the same for married gay couples. In the event of legalizing gay marriage, same–sex married couples will be given a range of benefits that include employee benefits, inheritance and real estate rights, child custody, emergency health care procedures and tax laws. (Kuiow, Spring 2001) There are some employers that currently give domestic partners benefits, at their discretion. However, because there is not a final document of proof that a gay couple is indeed domestic partners, it makes it difficult for employers and others to determine what constitutes as a gay partnership. How does one go about in proving that they do in fact have a spousal equivalent in a same–sex relationship, rather than just a roommate? Granting gays the right to marriage or the equivalent of being married without the Church being involved would open up numerous solutions and put the gray areas of gay relationships to rest.
As the numbers of gay couples have risen exuberantly in the last two decades, they no doubt
Gay Marriage Essay
There seem to be Specific time in history where certain issues define the culture tension in a society. They become representative of large worldview and clearly emphasize the battle between divergent moral and spiritual perspectives. Homosexual marriage in the United States is one of these issues.
In the past five years, there have been various threats and debates about the possibility of legalizing homosexual union. The issue took centre stage in February largely. The U.S Senate quashes a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gays from marrying. President Bush and other same–sex marriage opponents say they will try again. Most of Americans are against same–sex marriage because how the nation would change if gay were...show more content...
The budget study for the possible impact of same sex marriage that the office crunched numbers from census figures and other reports to estimate income taxes, Social Security, health care benefits and other federal programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, and food stamps. The government would pay more benefits in areas such as social security.
Third, gay marriage is against "Religious Speech". Some religious leaders think it could become more difficult legally to lecture against homosexuality if the nation were to support same sex marriage as a fundamental right. The argument has spread, reaching Christian television shows and church pulpits. Major religious organizations have issued warnings, including concerned women for America, focus on the family and the liberty counsel, and Orlando based group that has become a national leader in the fight against same– sex marriage. "A woman who married her lesbian partner in Massachusetts was banned from teaching in the church of Christ, Scientist after she refused to "repent" for her actions." A church letter sent to Kathleen Clement son said she had abused her role as a teacher and could teach spiritual healing again only if she repented and served a three– years probation. "I don't feel I have anything to repent for more than
Argumentative Essay on Gay Marriage
Wesley King Grammar and Composition lesson 75
Argumentative Essay on Gay Marriage Marriage is the ceremonial binding of two people, male and female, into one couple. Historically, marriage has been the institution when a man and a woman join together with the promise of love, devotion, to always stay together, to be there for each other, to take care of one another and to start a family together. Biblically, marriage has been all the aspects above, but including honoring, loving and growing closer to God and raising their family in ways that the Lord would have them, by abiding to the Word of God. Now days the traditional view of marriage is being changed by gay and lesbian couples demanding the same right...show more content...
God didn't create Adam and Steve, but Adam and Eve! The book of Leviticus gives God's rules to us for everyone, everywhere for all time, here on earth. Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind:
Reflective Essay On Gay Marriage
As a nurse I know that I will have to be aware of any prejudice and biases I may have toward a certain group of people. There was one instance where the idea of two men together seemed to bother me. One of my best friends in high school was homosexual and it never concerned me at that moment. It was fun hanging out with him. I went out with him and his potential new boyfriend to the movies and it didn't trouble me. After high school we went our separate ways and he moved away. I started hanging out more with a girlfriend of mine and some of her co–workers are homosexuals. We would go to a gay club with them and it was enjoyable and pleasant not to have creepy men trying to hit on us. On the way back home from the club she drove her friend back with his boyfriend and they started having a make out session in the car. It could have been that it was my first time seeing two individuals of the same sex behaving romantically. I remember my friend telling me, "Oh you'll get used to it, I thought it was weird to, but now I am over it." My friends statement was true I did eventually get over it, this was just something that I have never experiences before. Additionally, this is a learning experiences for me. I need to need to keep an open mind and although it may see unusual to me I shouldn't disapprove right away, without giving it a chance. Now when I see two same sex individuals it's like nothing and I applaud them for standing up for love.
Moreover, I do tend to
Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriage
Gay marriage is a topic that is so often discussed by those with highly diverse opinions. As some people agree with those of the same sex pursuing marriage, others do not seem to feel the same way. This fact can apply to individuals as well as entire countries. Several of these individuals and countries originally agreed with the subject of gay marriage as others were required to be forced due to the fact that their ban on gay marriage was decided as unconstitutional. Same–sex marriage is a controversial issue in today's world where some choose to agree with the decision of homosexual people and some choose to oppose it, all doing so usually for different reasons. Many different places have many different views on the belief that gay marriage is either right or wrong. In America, at least 37 states and D.C allow same–sex marriage to take place (NCSL). Within these states, some were originally okay...show more content...
These individuals, groups, organizations, etc. attempt to reject this idea by finding ways to make it seem as though the government has contradicted itself. For example, they bring up the point that marriage is a covenant between a man and a man, not a woman and a woman or a man and a woman. Through this argument they are trying to make the point that when the government allows gay marriage to take place they are destructing a moral that has been set in place. Another way they try to go against the idea of same–sex marriage is by using religion. One of the most frequent arguments given for this situation is that "it will offend God." When the people who disagree use this argument, the goal is to hit a personal spot in someone's life in order to make them believe what they are doing or supporting is wrong. When those who oppose the situation take it to a personal level it is thought that it will have more of an impact on the argument that is being
Should Gay Marriage Be Legalized? Essay
Introduction What does it mean to be gay and why does society discriminate against those who are deemed to be gay? This paper establishes that being gay is primarily based on the supposition that one is either homosexual, transgender, lesbian, or bisexual. It also establishes that one of the primary reasons why gays are discriminated against within the society is religion; that some of the views held by different religious conclaves substantiate gay rejection by the society. On a more personal rather than institutional level, this paper also reveals that the culture of gay is also largely rebuked based on individual philosophies and moral standings which is precisely the min reason as to why hate crimes against gays have in the past found a substantive projection. In the American socio–cultural fabric, the emergence of gays has generated a continuous debate about gay marriage; essentially whether it should be legalized or not. The debate has pitted religion verses gay rights activists who base their arguments on the equal rights protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution. In conclusion, this paper will elaborate on some of the some of the states that have inherently legalized gay marriage, the projection of the issue five years from today, and how society can assist in making the world a better place for gays.
Background on Homosexuality For purposes of coherence, the word gay will be periodically interchanged with the phrase homosexual. To
Essay on Gay Marriage
"Men and women of full age, without limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and have a family" (The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 5). This article from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights set forth by the United Nations clearly states that any adult, man or woman, has the right to marry. At the beginning of the Declaration, there is another article saying that every human being is entitled to all rights set forth by this document without exception to any status. Unfortunately, most countries in the world, including the United States, except one status from this right: homosexuality. The marital rights of gay couples are violated every day because of the fear of the destruction of marriage and...show more content...
A lot of opposition for gay marriage comes from the issue of society's portrayal and fear of homosexuality. Homosexuality has come to represent something uncool or bad. Children can be heard describing they consider stupid as "so gay" and taunt others for being gay (Tushnet 2). The issue of public disapproving nature of homosexuality is also a problem. Nineteen percent of New Yorkers polled thought there should be no legal recognition of homosexual couples (Poll: 41 Percent New Yorkers Support Gay Marriage" 1). Even the families of gay people often times disapprove of their sexuality. Many people are thrown out of their homes, even disowned, after coming out. Many are harassed for their sexuality, even assaulted. For example, in 2006, a French man by the name of Bruno Weil was lured from a gay bar in Paris into a hotel room where he was beat and burned to near death by four men in what is being called a homophobic crime (Keaten 2–3).
The legal issue, however, is the main source of the problem. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) states that homosexual marriages will not be recognized on a federal level (Topic Overview: Gay Rights" 1). The problem also resides on a state level. Forty–three states have laws prohibiting homosexual marriages. Twenty–nine
Should Gay Marriage Be Legalized Essay
Legalization of gay marriage has been a major controversial topic for a long time. Although, many people do not know what it means to be homosexual, most people do not know the actual definition of homosexuality and they do not know how difficult it is to be gay in this society. There are many reasons why people are against gay marriage and homosexuals all together. Most of the reasons are based on religious bias another big reason is being afraid of the unknown. Some smaller reasons are that being heterosexual is such a social norm now a day's people are not used to the change. Also parents often time tell kids that homosexuality is not a good thing because of there own views. Gay marriage should be legalized because most of the people...show more content...
Back in 1985 gay rights were very strict they could not serve openly in the military, have sex without having the risk of being arrested, be protected under hate crime legislation, get married, be protected as a transgendered child, visit the same sex spouse in the hospital, come out as a celebrity and not have backlash, and identify as a transgender without being classified as having a mental disorder. These laws were in place 28 years ago and some of them have not changed; such as, be safe from being fired, get married, be parents in many states, serve the military as transgendered, and be served by every business. These are many of the hardships of being a part of the LGBT society. There are many reasons for things being the way they are still today.
Some of the reasons why people have such a hard time in accepting gay marriage have to do with, religion, accepting change, having parents tell you that it's not right. Most people know that religion has a lot to do with why people do not like gay marriage or gays in general. Each religion has there own opinion on the matter, Christianity can go both ways; it was traditionally considered a sin but other denominations have reconsidered or are in the process of changing. In the bible it does not specifically say anything about gay marriage. Judaism has three types of people who practice their religion and they
Research Paper On Gay Marriage
Gay Marriage Gay Marriage should be kept legal and gays should have access to adoption and reproductive technologies. Two people who love each other, regardless of gender, should be able to get married because all people are equal! The significance of my research will impact my final opinion and thoughts on this paper and will determine if I think the same of this issue. My goal is to teach about the hard fought battle for marriage equality, the history of gay couples and information/laws on gay adoption and reproductive technologies. I hope to change some people's negative opinions on this issue by showing them how hard gays have fought to be equal because "love is love and love has no labels". Note– I will only cover Gay Marriage in the...show more content...
More cities begin to marry gay couples and a new poll in 2004 shows 51% of Americans support Gay Marriage. But then cities and states begin to stop issuing gay couples marriage licenses and the country is in a "tug of war" state. More and more other countries began to support Gay Marriage and even a large denominational church started to support Gay Marriage. I am personally a LGBT Christian which many say you can't be but you can and there are many Gay Churches but I'm not going to get into that on this paper. States continued to ban and support Gay Marriage but finally in 2012 president Barack Obama announced he supports Gay Marriage. States start to legalize Gay Marriage and even some churches begin to marry gay couples. After 35 states legalize Gay Marriage the US Supreme Court legalizes Gay Marriage in all 50
Argument Supporting Gay Marriage Essay
People are born homosexual. If you are homosexual you cannot get married. That idea is ridiculous. On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same–sex couples to marry. Marriage is defined as a sacred bond of love between two people. Gay people also feel love therefore, they should be allowed the same rights as everyone else in this country. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with a proven biological causation. The only thing that should matter in marriage is love and denying them this is a violation of religious freedom.
According to studies done by Simon LeVey, being gay is a biological cause, not a choice made when one is very young. It is also an accepted...show more content...
The number one reason that heterosexuals marry is not to establish legal status, allow joint filing of taxes, or protect each other in medical decision–making. They marry because it is the ultimate expression of a person's love for another. Marriage is a commitment that says "I love you so much that I want to live the rest of my life with you. I want to share the ups and downs, forsake all others, and be together until death do us part." Should it matter that the couple doesn't fit into what society is used to? What matters is that they love each other. Some people talk about living wills and other legal contracts that can give homosexuals essentially the same rights as a married couple. If that is the case, why don't all heterosexual couples use these legal maneuvers instead of marriage? Just maybe there's something more to it. This whole act denies them their right to show affection and denies them religious freedom.
The main reason for denying marriage to gay couples is that all major religions consider homosexuality a sin, however, the First Amendment of the Constitution clearly states that a person's religious views or lack thereof must be protected. Marriage by the state is a secular activity, the government cannot start making laws just because a religion says they should. What's next, should we make taking the Lord's name in vain a criminal activity because Christians consider it a breaking of a commandment? No! There are at
Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriage
Americans view/ deem to be happiness ont eh standards of the American Dream: the ability to achieve economic success. A "normalized" family based on American standards encompasses the idea of marriage and having children. Before the legalization of gay marriage, this "dream" was generally exclusive to heteronormative couples. Slowly, the acceptance of gay marriage as another possibility has opened up the "normalized" family structure to include homosexual couples. The dream is the image of happiness and for those who do not try to achieve it are not deemed happy. Those who choose to be included into this structure are more tolerated than others who do not fit in this molded construct. (AHMED W/ marriage and kids) Queer individuals try to replicate a model that can very well have been defined in heteronormative settings and trying to adapt it: performativity.
– Rodriguez's "normalized" family and how that ties into the American Dream of happiness. It Gets Better Campaign (Homonormativity): The idea of this campaign came out of a genuine interest to provide LGBTQ+ youth that were bullied the encouragement and hope to keep living. As a byproduct of this campaign, kids were given countless, but almost homogenous stories about the cruelty older LGBTQ+ people faced as teenagers and how they were able to still grow up and achieve. This alternative teaching element could very well plant the seed of thought that as long as they ended up gaining economic well–being, it would