Persuasive Essay On Law Breaking
Depending upon the country in question, a government can very strict or very lenient. In society, laws and rules are put into place to keep order and peace among citizens. There is an extent, though, when it comes to the fairness of these laws. To say that there is no relevant reason to ever break the law is unrealistic, because it will always be a case by case situation when it comes to the controversy of law breaking.
Not all laws are put into place to benefit every citizen. After the abolition of slavery in 1865, segregation ensued in the United States that discriminated against any person of color. Whites were to be kept on this side and blacks were to be kept on the opposite. Breaking a ridiculous law such as drinking from an unassigned water fountain came with harsh punishments and the placement of these rules were made with malicious intent and the people it discriminated against were undeserving of that. One act that was thought of to be a crime is the love between two individuals where one person was black and the other was white. The law withholding black and white people marrying only repealed a few decades ago. In what way has love ever been a crime.
Debatably, many laws hold no real necessary effect on a lot of states and countries. An example would be the law in Florida that forbids single women from parachuting on Sundays. This law was put into place many years ago to "preserve the morals of the United States". Though the law isn't usually enforced nowadays, the questionably sexist law is sometimes used for weak cases by lawyers and sometimes even politicians. A more notable law is one that exists in seven U.S. states that restricts atheists from holding public office. Since 1961, this law hasn't been enforced but candidates for public office do still face discrimination at polls due to the belief of others that people who don't believe in God have no morals and aren't trustworthy. In Saudi Arabia, there is no minimum age for marriage, and the harm that comes from this law is self–explanatory in a situation where an eight year old girl married to a fifty–eight year old man is denied the right to divorce him. Though two of the laws previously mentioned are no longer enforced, the emphasis lies in
My Dream Job: Being a Lawyer Essay examples
"The jury has made their decision, the plaintiff has been found guilty." These are the words that one day I will finally hear. My future goal is to be a lawyer. A lawyer is a professional person authorized to practice law. They defend or prosecute people for the crimes they have committed. (dictionary.com) I am very out spoken and believe in fighting for what I want or think is right.
Being a lawyer means that there are many responsibilities to carry out. It takes a great deal of timing and patience to finish the job,which I'm sure I can handle. Being a lawyer can be a tough job to work on. All you have to do is work as much as you can to succeed on the case. A beginning lawyer makes about $25,000–$128,000 a year. (Pasternak & Thornburg...show more content...
If you receive retirement, benefits in the form of pension or annuity payments from a qualified employer retirement plan. The amounts you receive may be fully taxable or partly taxable. (www.lawyers.com)
An aspiring lawyer must enter law school and complete a Juris doctor program. However, before applying to law school, an undergraduate degree must first be completed. In some places, a drug test is randomly completed. (www.lawyer.com) Lawyer's students set on a career in law need to continue getting good grades in their university life, and not make the error of thinking that it is only the end–of–third–year exam performance that counts. First and second–year exam results are taken into account by firms and chambers when considering applicants for work experience, as well as training contracts/pupils. (www.aboutlawschools.org) Personally this is something I wouldn't need to adjust to being growing up my mom always made sure I was on track with my school work.
Some skills are needed as stated in "The Criminal Justice Lawyer on page 1" it says "the ability to write high quality legal briefs that successfully present the client's case". A lawyer needs to have a lot of knowledge of the law and the rights of the people. They should also know how to analyze legal issues in light of the existing state of the law. (www.aboutlawschools.org) It is also important to know the road in which the law is headed, and important policy
Essay on Labour Law
Labour law also known as employment law deals with the body of laws, administrative rulings and precedents which addresses the legal rights of and restrictions on working people and their organizations1. The direct function of labour law is that it deals with the rules governing employment relationship. Labour law functions through the role accorded by common law, legislation and is helped also by the extra legal sources such as the customs and collective bargaining. Labour law is divided in to two broad categories namely collective and individual labour law. Collective labour law deals with the relationship concerning employer, employee and the trade unions, however the individual labour law deals with the rights of employees contact and...show more content...
Regulation 13 of the working time regulation states that a worker is entitled to four weeks annual paid leave each year. So as the working time regulation came in implementation another issue arose that was of the delay in implementation of the directive by the united kingdom and hence the issue was weather it could be relied upon in between the intervening period. However the procedure of relying upon the directive is through the process of vertical direct effect and it could only be relied upon when the deadline for the implementation of directive has passed. This question was placed and answered in the case of Gibson v east riding of Yorkshire and it was stated that in order to be relied upon the directive has to be clear and precise. Hence it was held that art 7 of the directive was not clear and precise as it did not clearly state the length of time required for a worker to work in order to be eligible for the annual leave.
Further another issue which was brought up was the unauthorized deduction of wages by the employer. Sec 13 of the employment rights act 1996 states that claim for any unauthorized deduction by the employer can be made with in three months of the deduction and further sec 23(3) states that the time limit for three months starts from the last unauthorized deduction made. However in the case of list design group v Douglas and other a worker was allowed to bring claim for non payment of holiday pay by the employer over a two year period. It was
The Rule of Law Essay
The rule of law is a difficult concept to grasp and proves elusive to substantive definition. However, the following work considers the attempts of various social and legal theorists to define the concept and pertinent authorities are considered. Attitudes and emphasis as to the exact shape, form and content of the rule of law differ quite widely depending on the socio–political perspective and views of respective commentators (Slapper and Kelly, 2009, p16), although there are common themes that are almost universally adopted. The conclusions to this work endeavour to consolidate thinking on the rule of law in order to address the question posed in the title, which is at first sight a deceptively simple one.
The rule of law
Modern...show more content...
Slapper and Kelly postulate that:
"the 'rule of law' represents a symbolic ideal against which the proponents of widely divergent political persuasions measures and criticise the shortcomings of contemporary State practice." (Slapper and Kelly, 2009, p15)
These commentators concede that the concept 'lacks precision' and that its meaning changes over time. Noted legal philosopher Joseph Raz accepted the necessity for State intervention in society and suggests that the rule of law is essentially a means of controlling, limiting and shaping the exercise of discretion in this intervention, rather than seeking to abolish it entirely (Raz, 1977, p195). Raz clearly appreciated the risks associated with the arbitrary and uncontrolled exercise of discretionary power and envisaged the principle of the rule of law as the primary safeguard against that threat.
Many other writers appear to share the opinion expressed by Raz that the raison d'être of the rule of law is to control the exercise of discretion, including Dicey, Hayek and Thompson, and to a lesser extent Unger and Weber. Dicey, for example, in his highly influential magnum opus, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, suggested that the rule of law is composed of three distinct and specific, but indivisible elements (Dicey, 1885, p179–201). These are:
1. An absence of arbitrary power in the hands of the State; 2. The supremacy of ordinary
Why Study Law Essay
Why study law? I think law is a course where you can practice practical skills and gain other skills too. Law is human rights; it is solving people's problems and getting to know what people go through. Firstly I want to study law because of the injustices that still exist in the world we are in and it bothers me a lot. I want to be the one that can change it. I want to be the one that will help people and get them justice. I want to the society to be equal and I want to fight for some human rights. I want to be a lawyer or an investigator in crime scenes because I love solving problems which are between two people and think about which option is the best to set and go for. I am a good listener and I like taking risks. I want to be...show more content...
I think studying abroad makes you gain some self confidence and know how to handle responsibilities by yourself. I will be able to rebuild my life from scratch. I will get to meet different people who lead to different cultures and I will meet an entirely new culture. I will get to ask the friends I will make about how is law back in their countries. How does their law differ from ours? I will be able to explore the world, the world that I yet didn't see. I will get to see how education is in different countries and get to experience it. Being an international student will help meet other international students and I will get to ask and see how cultures differ and what are their traditions are like. The steps I take are my future; I am the one who move my feet towards the goal I want. It is what I want to be and what I will hopefully be. There isn't anyone who could stop me from being what or who I want to become. Yes I will be alone and I will get lost a lot of times but that is part of rebuilding who I am. That'll teach me loads of things I never knew and I will learn more about
Corporate Law Essay
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE COMMLAW 7011 CORPORATE LAW (M)
BUSINESS SCHOOL
Week 3, Semester 1, 2012
TUTORIAL QUESTIONS
WEEK 3 (Commencing Monday 12 March)
Acknowledgement: These Tutorial Questions were originally devised by Martin Markovic, Senior Lecturer, Business School, University of Adelaide.
Question 1
A, B and C are long time friends from University days. They share common interests especially with respect to making money. A is a computer programmer for a bank, B is a chartered accountant and C a corporate lawyer. While having drinks after work one evening in May, A indicated that he had become disenchanted with the lack of challenge at his work. He...show more content...
In July, A, B and C entered into a joint venture agreement with D whereby:
(i) A, B and C were granted the sole distribution rights for the products in South Australia for a fee of 20% of the annual net profits of A, B and C's business;
(ii) A, B and C agreed to comply with any marketing instructions issued by D;
(iii) A, B and C agreed to purchase all their computing products exclusively from D. This was most unusual as all their competitors purchased products from a range of computing companies.
(iv) D had a right to inspect the business venture's books of accounts and a right to receive quarterly statements.
In December, at a computing trade exhibition, A is overcome by an exciting range of new products being offered by IBN Computers Ltd. He immediately attempted to phone B and C on his mobile phone but was unsuccessful. A, being the impetuous person he was, couldn't wait and ordered $250,000 of computing products from IBN.
Provide advice with respect to:
(i) the nature of the relationship between A, B and C;
(ii) the nature of the relationship between A, B and C and D;
(iii) The legal consequences of the $250,000 order with
Essay on Consumer Protection
Consumer Protection In this guide I will clarify many issues concerning consumer protection, the first issue I would like to clarify is what consumer protection is all about.
Consumer protection is about protecting ordinary people who buy goods and services, from the being sold faulty goods or poor quality services from dodgy traders.
Any person has some basic legal rights if a product or service is found to have a false description, is of poor quality or not fit for its purpose.
There are five main consumer protection laws which serve to protect these rights, they are:
1. The Sale Of...show more content...
This Law is becoming tighter for the unqualified builders who start work take some payment and then vanish without completing the job
Consumer protection can also help you if you are misquoted a price for a holiday say you are looking for a cheap holiday and you find one in the newspaper the price to go Dubai is £299 and you ring the company up to book the tickets however when you phone them up they say the price is actually £350 as they never included the price with VAT then through the trading
Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Justification of Defying Unjust Laws
In his famous essay, "Letter from Birmingham Jail,'' Martin Luther King, Jr. cites conscience as a guide to obeying just laws and defying unjust laws. In the same way, Henry David Thoreau wrote in his famous essay, "Civil Disobedience," that people should do what their conscience tells them and not obey unjust laws. The positions of the two writers are very close; they use a common theme of conscience, and they use a similar rhetorical appeal of ethos. In "Civil Disobedience" Thoreau claims that men should act from their conscience. Thoreau believed it was the duty of a person to disobey the law if his conscience says that the law is unjust. He...show more content...
He disagreed with other American people who believed the majority should change the law first because it is a worse thing to disobey the law than to do what an unjust law says to do. Thoreau wrote that breaking the unjust laws is better: "Break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine" (Thoreau, P. 18). However, Thoreau did not think people should be criminals. He thinks a criminal is a person who disobeys the law but will not be responsible for that. If a person disobeys an unjust law, Thoreau thinks that the person must do that, so all people can see he is disobeying the law because it is unjust. Then the person must accept what happens to him for disobeying the law.
Thoreau wrote that people must be willing to go to jail if they want to change a law by disobeying the law. Thoreau went to jail instead of paying for his taxes because he believed the government used the money for unjust things. This is how Henry Thoreau thinks people can change unjust laws. He thought that if people willingly would to go to jail and quit their jobs, then the revolution will take a place and reform will come. Thoreau was willing to go to jail to change unjust laws because of his conscience.
King's position on unjust laws was very close to Thoreau's position on unjust laws. In his famous letter written when he was in jail, "Letter from Birmingham Jail," King wrote to the ministers who did not like his protests to desegregate the city of
The Principles of Police Leadership Essay
All organizations, especially law enforcement agencies, require leadership. Maintaining a dependable leadership structure is key to the success of any organization. The philosophy of the modern style of police leadership involves a leader who is strong, competitive and unreceptive to change. Police leadership is based from an autocratic style which is founded on integrity and courage, embracing teamwork, involvement and shared leadership (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010). This style of leadership works well in an emergency situation in which rapid decision making and strict control is needed. The negative aspect to this style of leadership is the inability of the organization to function with the absence of leadership. A...show more content...
This method of crime prevention gave way to the idea that it was better to be proactive than wait until after a crime has been committed. The strategy of using preventative patrol was how law enforcement eventually achieved deterrence. This English method also contributed three features: limited police authority, local control of the police agency, and a fragmented system of law enforcement (Walker, 1983). A fragmented system of law enforcement is very evident today. The United States currently has approximately 15,000 different police agencies. These individual police agencies are subject to little coordination with minimal national regulation (Walker, 1983).
Research / Analysis The style of police leadership has gradually changed over the last several years. The traditional belief that the solitary leader who possessed the wisdom, integrity, and courage to manage a police department, or a shift of officers has been replaced with the concept of teamwork (Wuestewald, 2013). The idea of using a team to manage an organization is nothing new in the private sector, however, replacing the old idea of a solitary leader has taken time and is slow to take hold in some organizations. A 2006 case study of the benefits of shared management in police agencies was conducted on the Broken Arrow Police Department (BAPD). The BAPD is a police department which employs 165 persons in Oklahoma. A focus of the study was to shift the police
Essay about law assessment
Law Assessment
Outcome 1
1) List the main sources of Scots Law?
Legislation (Statute)
Judicial Precedent
Institutional Writers
Custom
2) List any four Acts of Parliament from within the UK
Statute of Westminster adoption Act 1942
Post–16 education Act 2013
4th road bridge 2013
National trusts act 2013
3) What is meant by the doctrine of judicial precedent and give an example?
Judicial precedent refers to the sources of law where past decisions made by judges create law for future judges to follow. An example would be the Donoghue vs Stevenson case, where Stevenson had bought ginger beer, and Donoghue had drank it after their been a decomposed snail in it, however their was no charge because she was not in a contract with...show more content...
7) What are the four most important institutions of the European Union? Explain their role in the law making process.
The council of ministers– This is the European Union's main decision making body, it is composed of ministers from the National governments of each of the member states, and meets in Brussels or Luxembourg to agree legislation and policy.
The European Commission – The commission is the EU's administrative and executive body, it is headed by a president and has a further 24 commissioners.
The European parliament – the EU citizens elect a Member of Parliament, which Leads to subsequent legislation.
The European Court of Justice – The court has a judge fro each member state that sits for a term of six years. The court adjucates on all legal issues and disputes involving community law and must ensure that community law in uniformly interpreted and effectively applied.
8) Explain Institutional Writing and its role in Scots Law?
Writers, lawyers in the 17th and 18th centuries wrote books setting out principles on which Scots law is based, many based on roman Law, lawyers apply the principles to situations, e.g. Stair, Bell, Erskine.
9) Explain custom and its role in Scots law?
Custom is eroded by Statute and development of EU authority in 19th century customer responses of community, a court may be asked to give effect to a custom when giving judgement, must add
Public Law And Private Law Essay
With respect to the misleading and aggressive trade practices, two set of remedies were given by both the public law and the private law. Even though the two sets refer to the same conduct, their concept and terminology were completely different and thus give rise to varied outcomes. While the former was usually emphasized by officers working in the Trading Standards Services and the Office of Fair Trading through criminal sanction and implemented under the Enterprise Act 2002, the latter was usually enforced through small claims by the offended consumers by using the common law system per se for disputes between businesses. Therefore, the 2014 Regulations was adopted so as to fill the gap between the enforcement of public law and private law in respect of consumer law on misleading and aggressive practices. The 2014 Regulations provide two tiers of remedies. Specifically, Tier 1 stipulates the standard remedies, including the right to unwind and the right to a discount, which shall apply for all cases without requiring the proof of loss. Tier 2 namely damages, provides additional remedies which allow consumer to claim compensation for damages with the requirements of evidence of loss. Correspondingly, this part will introduce (1) the conditions to apply the new rights, analyse and compare to the remedies under traditional law in respect of (2) the standard remedies, (3) the additional remedies and also discuss about (4) the probable limits in the level of protection of
The Role of Paralegals in the Legal System Essay
Justice. It is something that everyone wants, something that we strive for, even something that sparks. However, when we think of lawyers, we think of superheroes with an expensive education, walking into the courtroom and serving up justice. What no one thinks of is the person that helped the lawyer get there, the paralegal that prepares the necessary documents, the paralegal that makes sure his or her attorney is at the right place at the right time. A paralegal is crucial and in some cases vital to our justice system yet they are so often over looked.
To understand what a paralegal does we must first understand what the job of a lawyer entails. Black's Law Dictionary defines a lawyer as "a person learned in the law; as an attorney,...show more content...
The next couple of hours were a whirlwind of this attorney going over the countless motions and discoveries that were in this relatively thick file.
With such short notice there was something that was vital to him "winning" this hearing, it was the criminal paralegal a couple of offices over. If it were not for her meticulousness then the hearing would have been a disaster. I interviewed a couple of the paralegals at the Summit Law Firm and one of them was Ana Lopez, the Criminal Case Manager, during the interview she emphasized the attention to detail that is needed to be a great paralegal. Depending on where and in what field of the law one works in the number of cases that one handles can vary drastically. At the Summit Law Firm the number of caseload is growing and with that comes the chance that something falls in between the cracks.
When a doctor performs surgery and leaves a scalpel or a sponge inside the patient chances are there is going to be a medical malpractice lawsuit, although uncommon legal malpractice suits do exist. Sally Greer the Civil Case Manager for the Firm told me about the deadlines that cannot be missed in civil cases like Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, and Social Security. In a legal malpractice suit the client has to show that the attorney was negligent and the lack of strategy on the attorney's part caused the harm to the client.
All of this boils down to a couple of vital attributes to a great
The Rule Of Law, No One Is Above The Law
With the Rule of Law, no one is above the law. If we have a king, he will think he is above the law and not be charged or accountable for any of his crimes. It also provides a foundation for everyone to be treated fairly because it gives stable, impartial laws that cannot be changed. This way, if a law is broken, the offender cannot be given extra punishment if he is an outcast or unwanted in a village. The village may have grudges against them or want revenge on them, but the law protects him from receiving anything other than a fair trial.
We all have agency, the right to make decisions and choices on our own. We have used our agency to build a society where we have judges to decide our laws to best govern and protect this...show more content...
Holland without a king hath enjoyed more peace for this last century than any of the monarchical governments in Europe." If we choose to accept a king, we will surely follow this route, and we will be at war for reasons which do not affect the people. Thomas Paine states that it is the pride of King's that cause nations to go to war. Why should we the people be forced to go to war if we do not approve of it? We cannot leave our sons lives in the hands of a man who with the slight hurt to his ego, would throw the entire nation against the offender. It simply would not represent the people as a whole. Mentioning a lack of representation of the people, look at all of the infringements the American people had on their rights by the British, according to the Declaration of Independence. There were taxes placed on them without consent, they were forced to quarter British troops in their homes during times of peace, they were prevented from expanding their land or borders, and even prevented them from the abundant possibilities of trade routes with other countries. All of this, due to the decisions of one man over the rest. As Thomas Paine said "In England a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in
Oppression Of Laws And Law
There are no inherent definitions of right and wrong because we live in a world where there are countless interpretations of what those two words mean. So much of the time, right and wrong are defined by authority and reinforced by tradition. The people who are privileged, the ones in power, they decide right and wrong for the scores of people that follow them. They could have good intentions or they could be self–serving, but it wouldn't matter, because in the end their word is law. Laws therefore cannot protect justice, just reflect the wills of their writers. Since the definitions of right and wrong cannot be pinned down, if one wished to have a legal system uphold justice, the laws would need to be ever changing. However, laws that benefit...show more content...
One of the biggest grievance of being marginalized is in the definition, one is seen as insignificant or as an outsider. The marginalized will never win in a shouting match against the majority because no one is listening. Peaceful resistance draws the attention to the oppressed, a very hard feat to accomplish without undermining one's cause. Martin Luther King Jr. and others that participated in the Birmingham protests in the 1960s helped raise awareness about the atrocities that were committed in the city (Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]). These protests demanded acknowledgement for those exploited and persecuted, and led to great reform. Without said reform, America would not be able to call itself a "free society" today.
Whether peaceful protests are just or not is not the most important aspect of them, they cause citizens to question their belief in laws, which is how a society evolves. As Charles Frankel reminds readers in his article "Is it Right to Break the Law?" citizens need to take responsibility for their choices and their hand in making laws. Peaceful protest help to make others aware of their hand in the subjugation or empowerment of others. Aware citizens are necessary for free society, without them, citizens blindly following delivers the government back into the hands of the
Why I Chose Law School
I have multiple reasons for attending law school. It began when I was searching for a career of interest while in undergrad, but it was not until I spent time after college, that I finalized my decision to go to law school. My immediate concerns, was finding a long term career that utilized my skills, and was interesting. I ultimately chose law because I had opportunities to advocate for myself and others; a legal career would enable me to have a career advocating. While living in New York City, my outlook on a legal career was broadened, and I saw the multitude of options that the degree offered. Beforehand, I knew of criminal attorneys and the enigmatic corporate attorneys. Now I know that there are lawyers in many fields, and there are
Becoming a Lawyer Essay
Becoming a Lawyer
The career I have chosen is to become a lawyer, in either a private practice or firm, or for the government. The definition of a lawyer is an advocate or advisor in society, that is as an advocate, to represent one of the opposing parties in a criminal or civil trial, and as an advisor to counsel clients as to their legal rights and suggest courses of action. But that is not all a lawyer is about. Being a lawyer takes hard work, dedication, and many years in school. Before you become a lawyer, there are many educational hills you must climb. First of all, like in most jobs, you must have a high school diploma. Then there's college. You must attend a four year college, although you may graduate in three, were as you...show more content...
The chance of becoming a lawyer or the availability of the job is good, although not all lawyers are good ones. There were 656,000 lawyers in 1994, and three fourths of them, that's 75%, were all in private firms. The salary of a lawyer depends on a few factors. One, whether or not you work privately or in a large firm plays a big role. For example, most private lawyers start off around $37,000 a year, but in some large firms, starting salaries got as high as $80,000 per year. The top salaries are received by good lawyers in top firms reached $1 million a year. But the average lawyer in a good firm makes around $115,000 per year, which I might, add is not bad at all to say the least. The other factor is whether or not you are good at being a lawyer. The largest benefit in this career is probably the money, but a benefit can be if you handle pressure well or not, and if being a lawyer is something you really want to do. The reason for that is the demands are very high. You must be willing to work irregular and long hours, and be able to work well under pressure, especially when a case is being tried. But a negative aspect is that it can be very hazardous to your mental state because of all the pressure and stress you must deal with. As time goes on, and eventually by the time you can retire, your situation
Freedom Writers Essay
Freedom Writers Essay
In the movie, The Freedom Writers Mrs. Erin Gruwell (Hillary Swank) plays a role of a dedicated teacher who did all she could, to help her students learn to respect themselves and each other. She has little idea of what she's getting into when she volunteers to be an English teacher at a newly integrated high school in Long Beach, California. Her students were divided along racial lines and had few aspirations beyond basic survival. Mrs. Gruwell was faced with a big challenge when a group of freshmen students showed her nothing but disrespect which made it hard for her to communicate, teach and understand them. However, Erin Gruwell was determined that no matter the cost she would teach her students not only...show more content...
They were stories of broken and dysfunctional homes, being kicked out of the house for being part of a gang, to being beaten up just because they were different. Reading these journals Mrs. "G" realized how similar each student's stories were no matter the race, ethnicity or gender. Even though the students did not see eye to eye, they all had many things in common: they were all in gangs; they each had their own stories to tell; each student has dealt with the shooting of a friend, each student want to communicate to others, and each student wanted to be respected.
Upon realizing all of the similarities between each student, Mrs. "G" then began to strive for her students to realize this too, so she comes up with a "line game" for the students. She places a line on the floor with tape and the students walk to the line when the question that Mrs. "G" asks applies to them. At first she asks silly questions like "How many of you have the new Snoop Dogg album?" or "How many of you have seen Boyz n the hood?" but as the game goes on she begins to ask more serious questions like "How many of you have lost a friend to gang violence?" when every single student steps up to the line for each question they begin to realize that beneath their race their ethnicity and affiliation to a gang, that as teenagers they are a lot alike, with many of the same experiences.
As the year goes on the students realize more and more how similar
Law School Essay
Law School
Perhaps one of the most difficult aspects of the practice of law is learning to be a lawyer. Virtually every new lawyer today is a graduate of law school, a much dreaded, but fulfilling journey to practicing law. Modern law schools differ greatly from their earlier counterpart, in that many more requirements and responsibilities exist. In colonial times, students pursuing a career in law would enter institutions for instruction of the law, and would automatically become qualified to practice law in the courts after a few years of study. Today, however, becoming a lawyer takes much more training, rigorous work and effort, and many years of studying in order to take a bar exam of which passage represents qualification....show more content...
These sections include logical reasoning, analytical reasoning, reading comprehension, a writing sample, and an experimental section, which does not count toward the final score of the law school applicant. The writing sample is not scored either, but it is sent to every law school to which an aspiring law student applies. Law schools usually do not use it as a significant part of the admissions process. Admission requirements of prestigious schools in the United States differ greatly with those of the less prominent. As written by the Dean of Admissions at Stanford Law School: "Admission to Stanford Law School is based primarily upon superior academic achievement and potential to contribute to the development and practice of the law. Competition is severe: the 178 members of the Class of 2002 were selected from among 4,000 applicants, and most were drawn from the upper 5 percent of their undergraduate class and the upper 5 percent of the LSAT pool. The class that entered in 1999 numbered 93 women and 85 men, over half of whom had been out of college for two or more years." In contrast, other less–prominent law schools around the nation do not present nearly as strict requirements for applicants. In evaluating individual files, the faculty of any law school considers the record of both undergraduate and graduate education, and the applicant's talents, nonacademic experience, and